Friday, May 19, 2017

Beginner's guide to the Iranian election

Frida Zeinali / youthjournalism.org
A young supporter of presidential candidate Hassan Rouhani holding her sign that says, "We want bridges, not walls. We want peace, not wars."

By Frida Zeinali
Reporter
TABRIZ, Iran– Iranian citizens went to the polls Friday to elect their president for the next four years. The citizens were also voting to elect members of the country’s city and village councils but the focus is on the national race for the presidency.
Presidential elections have become the most crucial political event in Iran since the 1979 revolution.  This year’s election marks the 12th presidential race and the first one after the 2015 nuclear deal.
In Iran, the president is second in power after the Supreme Leader and is responsible for implementing the constitution and Iran’s macro policies. The consequences of elections have always resonated in both Iran and the world.
Frida Zeinali / youthjournalism.org
A crowd of young people gathered recently in front of candidate Hassan Rouhani's campaign center.


Candidates

This election has become a race between two of the strongest candidates: incumbent moderate/reformist president Dr. Hassan Rouhani and his rival, Principlist Ebrahim Raeisi. Both candidates share a judicial background and high revolutionary credentials. Other strong candidates had been Reformist First Vice President Es'haq Jahangiri and Principlist mayor of Tehran Mohammed Bagher Ghalibaf. But these two announced their withdrawal from the race on Monday, with Jahangiri calling on his supporters to vote for Rouhani, and Ghalibaf endorsing Raeisi.
Mostafa Mir Salim, a Principlist, and Mostafa Hashemi Tabaa, a Reformist, stayed on the ballot for the presidency, but Tabaa urged his supports to vote for Rouhani and increase his chance of victory.


Difference between Reformists and Principlists

Principlists rely on the main ideas of the 1979 Islamic Revolution and an administration with Islamic values.
Independence from foreign states is a rigid part of their foreign policies. On the other hand, Reformists are a political front defending democracy under the Constitution. They also tend to promote interactions internationally based on Iran's national benefits. These two terms rose to popularity during the presidency of Mohammad Khatami from 1997 to 2005 and have been popular ever since.

Campaigns, Process, and Results

Iran's election system is based on voting for individual candidates, rather than voting for political parties. Therefore, the campaigns were mainly focusing on individuals.
Schools, mosques, and governmental offices served as polling places.
Frida Zeinali / youthjournalism.org
Iranian newspapers focused on the election.
Voting started at 8 a.m. and the polls were supposed to close at 6 p.m. but remained open for several extra hours due to the huge demand from people to vote.
The winner may not be immediately known.
“After getting the opinion of the Guardian Council and the resolution of a legal issue, the results of the vote counts in this election will be announced gradually,” said the head of the Interior Ministry’s election headquarters Mohammad Hossein Moqimi late Wednesday, according to the ministry’s website.
After counting the votes, the candidate with 50 percent of the votes plus one will become the president of Iran. But if the leading candidate got less than 50 percent of the votes, the lead and the runner-up would then go for a second round.
Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei symbolically cast the first ballot of the election and in his brief interview, he called Iranians to support the election and turn out in huge numbers.
“Regardless of who wins the majority of votes,” Khamenei said earlier, “the main winner is the regime of the Islamic Republic.”

Frida Zeinali / youthjournalism.org
Graffiti on the street of Tabriz, Iran says, "I vote, therefore I am."
*** 
Cast your vote for democracy and press freedom worldwide 
by supporting Youth Journalism International.
Your tax-deductible contribution makes a difference.

Tuesday, May 9, 2017

The take away from the French election

From the Emmanuel Macron official Facebook page
Emmanuel Macron, the newly elected French president

By Emily Couch
Associate Editor
Youth Journalism International
BRISTOL, Connecticut, U.S.A. – Emmanuel Macron mounted the stage outside the Louvre Sunday night to proclaim his victory over conservative Marine Le Pen in France’s presidential election. As ecstatic tricolor waving crowds chanted, ‘Macron Président!’ and the man himself delivered an Obama-esque speech of hope and unity, Europe heaved a sigh of relief. 
At 39, Macron becomes the youngest president in French history, but his age is not the only thing that makes his victory noteworthy.   The story of the genius boy who married his teacher, became an investment banker, before emerging from political obscurity to found the game-changing grassroots movement that would carry him to the Elysée has been repeated so many times that it has become the stuff of legend.  Amidst all this, however, we must look not just at the man, but at the broader political trends he represents.
Fake news and leaks have their limits
With the ‘fake news’ phenomena never far from the lips of journalists or politicians, until last night, one might have thought that it would have had a considerable impact upon Macron’s chances. First, there was the video diffused by the pro-Le Pen Twitter user @KimJongUnique of Macron supposedly washing his hands after shaking hands with factory workers. Then there was #MacronGate, when Le Pen accused him of having off-shore bank accounts.  Thousands of Twitter users shared fabricated documents purportedly proving her claim.  Most recently, there was #MacronLeaks in which hackers released thousands of confidential documents and emails, interspersing these with fakes to confuse readers. In less than four hours, the hash tag – propagated by the American ‘Alt-Right’ and prominent Le Pen supporters – had been used more than 47,000 times. 
Yet for all these scandals, Macron emerged relatively unscathed and triumphant.   He, it seems, is France’s Teflon President.  Fake news, no matter how defamatory, simply does not stick to him.  Now, one could argue that this was all down to his personality.  Unlike Hillary Clinton, for whom the email scandal was a final nail in the coffin, he has undeniable charisma, which likely dissuaded many from believing the allegations.
We must not, however, ignore the agency of French voters. Anti-Macron sentiment was strong across the political spectrum.  This would, one would have thought, made it easy, for them to believe the stories.  And yet most chose not to.  Macron’s win may, therefore, indicate that the reign of fake news is weakening.  Voters, hyper aware of the concept since November, are becoming savvier about its signs and the intentions behind it.
Every (Western) election matters
There was once a time when it was only the U.S. presidential election that the world watched with bated breath.  But that was before Donald Trump stepped into the White House. On that day, the political consciousness of the West expanded. Other countries’ elections were not isolated domestic affairs to be dismissed, but crucial indicators of global political trends.
The first example of this was unusual attention accorded to the Netherland’s parliamentary elections in March. Incumbent Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s victory over far-right Geert Wilders was seen as a litmus test for European elections to come. Politicians and ordinary people alike now look to Europe to see if the countries of the Old World can stem the tide of right-wing populism. 
Never has a French election attracted so much foreign attention, of which former U.S. President Barack Obama’s endorsement was the pinnacle. Suddenly, the name ‘Emmanuel Macron’ was on the lips of everyone anti-Trump, even if they had little prior knowledge of French politics. With Hillary Clinton out of the game, Western liberals invested Macron as their new champion. A brief glance at Twitter, and we see writers, celebrities, and actors from America and beyond celebrating his win. 
Recently, we have seen how the extreme right has forged a community spanning from the U.S. across Europe to Russia through a bizarre combination of fake news, memes, and Kremlin support.
The international attention accorded to Macron demonstrates that this trend for trans-national political identification also applies to Liberalism. Globalization brings both greater inter-connectedness and greater division. Correspondingly, this new sense of trans-national political community, highlighted by Macron’s win, will strengthen ties within each political camp, while ultimately deepening the divide between them.

And Europe muddles on 

Throughout the campaign, Macron unashamedly wore his pro-EU sentiments on his sleeve.  His decision to enter the Louvre to Ode to Joy, the anthem of the EU, confirmed his commitment to the union.
In a post-Brexit era when ‘euroscepticism’ is never far from the headlines, it seems remarkable that 66 percent of voters would elect a self-styled champion of Brussels. Even though many of these voters chose Macron as the lesser of two evils, the fact remains that their discontent with the EU was not strong enough to push them into the arms of Le Pen. It is possible, then, that the power of euroscepticism, just like the power of fake news, is on the wane. 
Until now, German Chancellor Angela Merkel has borne most of the burden of keeping Europe together. Now, this responsibility will not only be shared, but zealously taken on by Macron.
In October, Germany will have its federal elections in which the main rivals are the incumbent Christian Democrat Merkel and the Socialist Democrat Martin Schultz. Either way, the country will have a staunch defender of pro-European at its prow.
With France and Germany united for the EU, it is unlikely to implode anytime soon. Macron’s victory may not be a wholesale endorsement of the European project, but it has certainly increased its chances of survival.

From outsider to insider: What comes next?

The greatest challenge the president-elect will face will be maintaining his political identity.  When the results became clear, Macron delivered the standard, mechanical speech expected of a political victor. He addressed a “republican salute to […] Madame Le Pen,” stated his respect for the “anger, the anxiety, the doubt” of her supporters, and promised to be a president for all, not just those who had voted for him.
Throughout the subdued six-minute speech he looked ill at ease, bored, as if he were reading somebody else’s script. 
Fast forward an hour to his speech outside the Louvre, however, and he was once again the messianic figure from the campaign trail.
Face shining with jubilation, he did what he does best: seduce the crowd.  “You have won, France has won,” he declared. “I will protect you […] I will fight for you.”
In that moment, he sounded not like a politician, but like a rock star thanking his fans.  
The transition from Macron the rock star to Macron the president will not be an easy one, as his awkwardness in the first speech portends. Macron fought his campaign by presenting himself as a man of the people, not the establishment.  However, as I wrote in my last article, Macron’s party En Marche! is unlikely to win a majority in June’s legislative elections. Forced into compromise and coalition, he risks losing this personal connection with the people, becoming absorbed into the establishment he fought to overturn.

On the move

France’s young president now faces daunting challenges: Establishing a majority for En Marche! during June’s legislative elections, strengthening and reforming the EU, and combating the terrorist threat, to name just a few.  With the U.S. under Trump’s thumb, the UK tangled in Brexit negotiations and Germany busy preparing for October’s federal elections, the responsibility for leading the ‘Free World’ and saving Europe has fallen in Macron’s lap.
Like many presidents, Macron will enjoy a post-election honeymoon, but the weight of expectation will ensure this is short-lived.  In the words of EU politician Guy Verhofstadt of Belgium: “Everyone is looking to France now, waiting for Emmanuel Macron to take the lead.”   
*** 
Want to know what's truly on a global march? 
YJI is a winner by any measure, because of the support
generously given by readers like you.
Your tax-deductible contribution makes a difference. Thank you.